References

AFMC (Air Force Materiel Command). Integrated Master Plan and Schedule Guide. AFMC Pamphlet 63-5. Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio: 2005.

Ambriz, Rodolfo. Dynamic Scheduling with Microsoft® Project 2007. Fort Lauderdale, Fla.: International Institute for Learning, 2008.

Ambriz, Rodolfo, and John White. Dynamic Scheduling with Microsoft® Project 2010. Fort Lauderdale, Fla.: International Institute for Learning, 2011.

Anderson, Joshua, and Jeff Upton. “Unleashing the Predictive Power of the Integrated Master Schedule.” Defense AT&L, January-February 2012: 34-38.

Anderson, Mark I. Recovery Schedules. Rockville, Md.: Warner Construction Consultants, 2006.

Antvik, Sven, and Håkan Sjöholm. Project Management and Methods (Projekt-ledning och metoder). Västerås, Sweden: Projektkonsult Håkan Sjöholm AB, 2007.

Bachman, David. Better Schedule Performance Assessments Derived from Integrated Master Plan-Referenced Schedule Metrics. Defense Acquisition University, October 2011.

Bolinger, Paul. Schedule Analysis of the Integrated Master Schedule. Orange, Calif.: Humphreys & Associates, May 2008.

Book, Stephen A. “Schedule Risk Analysis: Why It Is Important and How to Do It.” Presentation to the International Society of Parametric Analysts and the Society of Cost Estimating and Analysis. MCR. Denver, Colorado: June 14-17, 2005.

Chartered Institute of Building. Guide to Good Practice in the Management of Time in Complex Projects. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

Cooper, Sue L. “Basic Schedule Analysis.” Presentation to the International Society of Parametric Analysts and the Society of Cost Estimating and Analysis. Boeing, Denver, Colorado: June14-17, 2005.

Defense Acquisition University (DAU). ACC Practice Center—Risk Management. Fort Belvoir, Va.: December 2011.

DAU. Defense Acquisition Guidebook Chapter 14—Acquisition of Services, accessed May 20, 2015, http://acc.dau.mil/communitybrowser.aspx?id=490645.

Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). Earned Value Management System Compliance Reviews, DCMA-INST 208. Washington, D.C.: April 9, 2014.

DCMA. Finding the Program Critical Path, EVC-100 Rev1. Fort Lee, Va: November 20, 2012.

DCMA. Integrated Master Plan/Integrated Master Schedule Basic Analysis. Washington, D.C.: Nov. 21, 2009.

DCMA. Open Plan Integrated Master Schedule Assessment Guide, EVC-102 Rev8. Chester, Va: March 27, 2013.

DCMA. Overview: 14 Point Assessment, EVC-104 Rev1. Fort Lee, Va: n.d.

DCMA. Primavera® Integrated Master Schedule Assessment Guide, EVC-103 Rev7. Chester, Va: March 27, 2013.

DCMA. Project® Integrated Master Schedule Assessment Guide, EVC-101 Rev11. Chester, Va: March 27, 2013.

DCMA. Schedule Margin, EVC-106 Rev2. Alexandria, Va: March 14, 2013.

Defense Systems Management College. Schedule Guide for Program Managers. Fort Belvoir, Va.: October 2001.

Department of Defense (DOD). Department of Defense Standard Practice: Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items, MIL-STD-881C. Washington, D.C.: October 3, 2011.

DOD. Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule. Washington, D.C.: October 21, 2005.

DOD. Integrated Master Schedule Data Item Description, DI-MGMT-81650. Washington, D.C.: March 30, 2005.

DOD. Integrated Program Management Report, DI-MGMT-81861. Washington, D.C.: June 20, 2012.

DOD. Integrated Program Management Report Implementation Guide, Washington, D.C.: January 24, 2013.

DOD. Joint Agency Cost Schedule Risk and Uncertainty Handbook. Washington, D.C.: March 12, 2014.

Department of Homeland Security. Scheduling Handbook. Washington, D.C.: August 29, 2014.

Douglas, Edward E. III. Documenting the Schedule Basis, AACE International Recom¬mended Practice 38R-06. Morgantown, W. Va.: 2009.

Federal Aviation Administration. Acquisition Management Policy. Washington, D.C.: January 2012.

Government Accountability Office (GAO). Air Traffic Control Modernization: Management Challenges Associated with Program Costs and Schedules Could Hinder NextGen Implementation, GAO-12-223. Washington, D.C.: February 16, 2012.

GAO. Arizona Border Surveillance Technology Plan: Additional Actions Needed to Strengthen Management and Assess Effectiveness, GAO-14-368. Washington, D.C.: March 3, 2014.

GAO. Aviation Security: TSA Has Enhanced Its Explosives Detection Requirements for Checked Baggage, but Additional Screening Actions Are Needed, GAO-11-740. Washing¬ton, D.C.: July 11, 2011.

GAO. 2010 Census: Census Bureau Has Made Progress on Schedule and Operational Control Tools, but Needs to Prioritize Remaining System Requirements, GAO-10-59. Washington, D.C.: November 13, 2009.

GAO. Coast Guard: Action Needed as Approved Deepwater Program Remains Unachievable, GAO-11-743. Washington, D.C.: July 28, 2011.

GAO. Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide, GAO-09-3SP. Washington, D.C.: March 2009.

GAO. DOD Business Systems Modernization: Air Force Business System Schedule and Cost Estimates, GAO-14-152. Washington, D.C.: February 7, 2014.

GAO. DOD Business Transformation: Improved Management Oversight of Business System Modernization Efforts Needed, GAO-11-53. Washington, D.C.: October 7, 2010.

GAO. Nuclear Nonproliferation: DOE Needs to Address Uncertainties with and Strengthen Independent Safety Oversight of Its Plutonium Disposition Program, GAO-10-378. Wash¬ington, D.C.: March 26, 2010.

GAO. Immigration Benefits: Consistent Adherence to DHS’s Acquisition Policy Could Help Improve Transformation Program Outcomes, GAO-12-66. Washington, D.C.: November 22, 2011.

GAO. Nuclear Waste: Actions Needed to Address Persistent Concerns with Efforts to Close Underground Radioactive Waste Tanks at DOE’s Savannah River Site, GAO-10-816. Washington, D.C.: September 14, 2010.

GAO. Polar Weather Satellites: NOAA Identified Ways to Mitigate Data Gaps, but Contingency Plans and Schedules Require Further Attention, GAO-13-676. Washington, D.C.: September 11, 2013.

GAO. Transportation Worker Identification Credential: Progress Made in Enrolling Workers and Activating Credentials but Evaluation Plan Needed to Help Inform the Implementation of Card Readers, GAO-10-43. Washington, D.C.: November 18, 2009.

GAO. VA Construction: VA Is Working to Improve Initial Project Cost Estimates, but Should Analyze Cost and Schedule Risks, GAO-10-189. Washington, D.C.: December 14, 2009.

Hillson, David. Use a Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) to Understand Your Risks, Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium. San Antonio, Texas: October 3-10, 2002.

Hulett, David T. Advanced Project Scheduling and Risk Analysis. Los Angeles, Calif.: Hulett and Associates, 2009.

Hulett, David T. Advanced Quantitative Schedule Risk Analysis. Los Angeles, Calif.: Hulett and Associates, 2007.

Hulett, David T. Practical Schedule Risk Analysis. Farnham, Surrey, U.K.: Gower, 2009.

Humphreys and Associates, Inc. Project Management Using Earned Value. Orange, Calif.: 2002.

International Institute for Learning, Inc. Project Orange Belt® 2007. New York: 2007.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Cost Estimating Handbook. Washington, D.C.: February 2015.

NASA. Scheduling Management Handbook, SP-2010-3403. Washington, D.C.: March 2011.

National Defense Industrial Association. Planning and Scheduling Excellence Guide, v2.0. Arlington, Va.: June 22, 2012.

Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR). EVM Analysis Toolkit. Washington, D.C.: April 14, 2009.

NAVAIR. Integrated Master Schedule Guidebook. Washington, D.C.: February 2010.

NAVAIR. Integrated Project Management Toolkit. Washington, D.C.: n.d.

NAVAIR. Schedule Metrics Guide. Washington, D.C.: August 8, 2013.

NAVAIR. Schedule Risk Assessment Toolkit. Washington, D.C.: September 27, 2010.

O’Brien, James J., and Fredric L. Plotnick. CPM in Construction Management, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.

Project Management Institute, Inc. Practice Standard for Earned Value Management, 2nd ed. Newtown Square, Pa.: 2011.

Project Management Institute, Inc. Practice Standard for Project Risk Management. Newtown Square, Pa.: 2009.

Project Management Institute, Inc. Practice Standard for Scheduling, 2nd ed. Newtown Square, Pa.: 2011.

U.S. Air Force. Integrated Master Schedule Assessment Process. Washington, D.C.: June 7, 2012.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis Guidance. Draft. Washington, D.C.: May 17, 2009.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Schedule Processes and Procedures, v. 1.0. Washington, D.C.: March 28, 2012.

Uyttewaal, Eric. Dynamic Scheduling with Microsoft® Project 2003. Boca Raton, Fla.: International Institute for Learning, 2005.

VA (Department of Veterans Affairs). Master Construction Specifications—Architectural and Engineering CPM Schedules, 01 32 16.01. Washington, D.C.: n.d.

VA. Master Construction Specifications—Network Analysis Schedules, 01 32 16.13. Washington, D.C.: n.d.

VA. Master Construction Specifications—Project Schedules (Design/Build), 01 32 16.17. Washington, D.C.: n.d.

VA. Master Construction Specifications—Project Schedules (Design-Build Only), 01 32 16.16. Washington, D.C.: n.d.

VA. Master Construction Specifications—Project Schedules (Small Projects - Design/Bid/ Build), 01 32 16.15. Washington, D.C.: n.d.

Weaver, Patrick. Calculating and Using Float, November, 2009. Accessed August 25, 2015, http://www.mosaicprojects.com.au/Resources_Papers_110.html.